Music Theory. Maybe if it wasn’t called music theory and if teachers approached it as an exciting scientific adventure then students would be more enthusiastic about its study.
I feel that we have a very narrow approach to music education as a whole. It’s like we segment it into different unrelated topic areas and just expect students to connect the dots. Instead of integrating the broader areas of performance, composition, theory, aural training, history and philosophy into one holistic approach we study each in isolation. Performance and composition become the ‘fun’ subjects while theory, aural and history seem irrelevant and boring instead of interrelated, dynamic and exciting.
Unfortunately, this predicament is largely due to time, money and resources. Instrumental and music teachers are simply doing the best they can with what they’ve been given. Hopefully, this list will help you join some of the dots together and give some reasons and the motivation to pursue the study of music theory.
Music theory should be so much more than a collection of rules that must be memorised and adhered too. Theory (taught properly) doesn’t restrict creativity but gives people a system for naming and describing how music works. This allows us to make sense of the music and to understand the why; why certain thing work and why we like these pieces and not those pieces.
So, without further ado here is: